"The Inquisition, with its stipulation that torture and interrogation not jeopardize life or cause irreparable harm, actually set a more rigorous standard than some proponents of torture insist on now. The 21st century’s Ad extirpanda is the so-called Bybee memo, issued by the Justice Department in 2002 (and later revised). In it, the Bush administration put forth a very narrow definition, arguing that for an action to be deemed torture, it must produce suffering “equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death.” To place this in perspective: the administration’s threshold for when an act of torture begins was the point at which the Inquisition stipulated that it must stop."

- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (2)
Does this mean then, that the U.S. is more barbaric than the Inquisitors? From reading the details of the types of and standards in applying torture by Inquisitors, it sure seems like it.
Locke wrote his famous Letter Concerning Toleration in 1685. He made the case for freedom of thought and expression—and a certain humility regarding one’s own cherished beliefs—on the grounds that, no matter how much certainty is in our hearts, human beings cannot know for sure which truths are true, and that believing we can leads us down a terrible path.
Then why this peculiarly American phenomenon of periodic crazes for religious fanaticism?
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



