Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit MinnieApolis's column >>

MINNIEAPOLIS

Plays with her food.
Articles Posted: 433  Links Seeded: 2108
Member Since: 5/2007  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Syngenta's Atrazine Implicated in Frog Disappearance

Mon Aug 4, 2008 10:55 PM EDT
science, research, greenvine, studies, frogs, syngenta, atrazine, feminization, mini-paper
By MinnieApolis

Photo by Mo Riza. (License: Creative Commons Attribution)

Nothing like a bucket of frogs to make the day brighter. From Flickr.

Advertise | AdChoices

Here's how we think it works. Testosterone is a precursor to estrogen. In male frogs, it makes their voice boxes grow and their vocal sacs develop. But atrazine, in frogs, switches on a gene that makes the enzyme aromatase; it's silent. In these males, the estrogen induces the growth of ovaries, eggs and yolk. So you've got two things happening: the frog is demasculinized, and it's also feminized (Sobel, 2004).

Previous findings by Tyrone Hayes, a comparative endocrinologist at the University of California Berkeley, brought together emerging concerns about amphibian declines, endocrine disrupters, and chemical contamination of the environment. In a series of high-profile papers, Hayes reported that tadpoles exposed to levels of atrazine as low as 0.1 parts per billion (ppb) could develop gonadal abnormalities or become hermaphrodites, apparently because of disruptions in their endocrine system (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, Environ. Health Perspect. 2003,).

He proposed that atrazine-induced production of aromatase, which is an enzyme that converts testosterone to estrogen in vertebrates (including humans), and that this was feminizing the male frogs. Other researchers reported that atrazine had a range of endocrine-modulating effects on amphibians. But studies funded by Atrazine manufacturer Syngenta did not find adverse effects. The official report from the U.S. EPA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) report in 2003 found fault with all the studies.

But Hayes and the Natural Resources Defense Council still contend that, in its regulatory deliberations on atrazine, the U.S. EPA is biased in favor of Syngenta, and Hayes now actively campaigns for a ban on the use of atrazine."

But Hayes disagrees. The increase in female frogs is an important effect consistent with his findings, he says. "You don't know how many females you start with, but when you progressively get a 10% loss in males with every 10 ppb [increase in] atrazine, that is very statistically significant; something is real."

EPA's review

The paper from the Japanese researchers comes in the wake of an EPA review, which concluded in Oct. 2007 that Atrazine does not adversely affect gonadal development of the frogs. The panel evaluated the results of two large Syngenta-funded studies that adhered to an experimental protocol recommended by the SAP in 2003. Studies were conducted by 2 independent labs.

One was a contract lab, Wildlife International in Easton, Md., and Werner Kloas's lab at the Leibniz Inst. In Berlin (of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries). Both labs raised the tadpoles in glass tanks set up with a flow-through water system. The protocol: Five groups of 200 frogs each, were exposed to 0.01–100 ppb atrazine. The researchers looked for changes in sex ratio and the presence of mixed-sex animals, but they did not find any statistically significant changes.

The fact that the two studies that found no correlation between Atrazine and sex changes in the frogs just happened to be funded by Syngenta, seemingly escaped everyone's notice.

Differences in response to estrogen, bisphenol A, and dioxin have been reported in rats and mice, and difference in response to chemicals has been reported in Daphnia reproduction also, according to Osamu Tooi, one of the Japanese researchers. "The discrepancy of the present results and Hayes's studies may be caused by various factors, such as genetic differences in X. laevis used, water quality, including iodide ions, food, and the composition of aquaria," he says.

However Kloas argues that differences among subpopulations or strains still need to be proven. "Even in different species of frogs, the response to estrogen under similar conditions is close, within an order of magnitude…With concerns over feminization, all frog species tested so far react similarly," he said.

Amphibians and especially frogs are obviously in decline, but pinning down the evidence on Atrazine has been very tricky. Something or some number of things that we don't understand is going on with frogs, says Skelly.

SOURCES:

Blumenstyk, Goldie, The Story of Syngenta & Tyrone Hayes at UC Berkeley:
The Price of Research, http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/2003/Syngenta-Tyrone-Hayes31oct03.htm, Oct. 31, 2003.

Renner, Rebecca, Atrazine effects in Xenopus aren't reproducible, Environmental Science & Technology, http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2008/apr/science/rr_atrazine.html, April 9, 2008.

Suzawa and Ingraham, The Herbicide Atrazine Activates Endocrine Gene Networks via Non-Steroidal NR5A Nuclear Receptors in Fish and Mammalian Cells, PLoSOne.org,
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002117, 2008.

Dini, Jack, on Junk Science.com, December 2007,
http://www.junkscience.com/jan08/fearing_frog_deformities.html

Sobel, Dava (editor), The Best American Science Writing, P.158, 2004. (for excerpt about how Hayes thinks Atrazine feminizes frogs) forthwith: http://books.google.com/books?id=HbT6AU_n7_YC&pg=PA157&lpg=PA157&dq=atrazine+frog+dieoff&source=web&ots=YHq5T8aIyg&sig=7Lq-RTpj0z4p0xh50APBax2e-9Y&hl=en#PPA158,M1

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • MinnieApolis's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Anthropology, Birding and Nature, Commercial Fishing United, Environment, Green Politics, Gulf of Mexico Disaster, Our Orwellian World, Science & Space Gateway, Science And Technology, Slow Food Living, The Food Professional's Page, The Green Room, water, WildlifeLandscapes
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (11)
MinnieApolis

Nothing like a bucket of frogs ---

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Aug 4, 2008 10:56 PM EDT
dungbeetlemania

While this is interesting, I suspect that it is only a very small part of the story. Amphibians are in decline all over the globe, even in seemingly pristine areas, so there has to be something else.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Aug 5, 2008 7:14 AM EDT
MinnieApolis

I am aware that amphibians are getting hit all over. And no one source of chemicals or anything else could account for all cases of disappearing frogs et al. Loss of habitat is big. Artificially stocking outside species that wipe out tadpoles or outcompete for food. And some may suffer due to purely local conditions like weather, rainfall, etc.
But the chemicals are man-made and are something we can control.

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Tue Aug 5, 2008 4:42 PM EDT
johnfiorentino-1

Thanks Minnie! Good stuff!

  • 4 votes
#2.2 - Tue Aug 5, 2008 7:00 PM EDT
dungbeetlemania

You get no argument from me there, MinnieApolis.

  • 3 votes
#2.3 - Wed Aug 6, 2008 2:41 AM EDT
Reply
MinnieApolis

Thanks for reminding me, John.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Tue Aug 5, 2008 8:27 PM EDT
analog ninja

This is a great science article. Golly G, I wish all Newsvine articles with regards to the sciences were relevantly and reliably sourced like this one. Cheers!

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Aug 6, 2008 10:53 PM EDT
MinnieApolis

You'll make me blush!

  • 2 votes
#4.1 - Thu Aug 7, 2008 12:20 AM EDT
Reply
MinnieApolis

I found yet another story in a science mag about agricultural chemicals and frogs. The Aug. 2 issue of Science News, in a story by Janet Raloff, and titled "Feminization blamed on farming -- Agricultural chemicals suspected in cane toad troubles" (print issue; the headline in the online version is "Farm life turns male toads female") once again linked feminized frogs to something in the agricultural runoff.

This time instead of controlled studies that compared different groups of amphibians exposed to different levels of a given chemical, the researchers just gathered up wild frogs at various locations in city and country. The gender abnormalities were found to occur far more often the closer they were to farms.

At sites associated with heavy agriculture (where half to 97 percent of the nearby land was farmed), only about 40 percent of the males had typical he-toad gonads and coloring. An equal number were intersex animals, possessing both testes and ovaries.

(picture)MORE THAN SKIN DEEP Mottled skin denotes a cane toad (left) is a female; drab plain skin typifies a male (right). Intersex individual (center toad) bears females' coloration, males' nuptial pads (what look like dark stains on the inner fingers), and inappropriate or malformed reproductive organs. K. McCoy et al./EHPAnother 20 percent or so of the males at the two sites having the most agricultural activity appeared outwardly male. However, as the intersex animals did, these superficially normal males sported a maturing Bidder's organ.

Like the human appendix, a toad's Bidder's tissue normally has no function. However, if males lose testicular function, a Bidder's organ may suddenly mature into an ovary, observes wildlife endocrinologist Louis Guillette, a coauthor on the new study. His team found that Bidder's organs in males from the agricultural regions were sometimes chock full of eggs (although their viability was never checked).

Feminized male toads had a female coloration, shorter forearms than normal males, and fewer nuptial pads (temporary features that develop on the fingers of males who are readying to mate). Levels of testosterone, the primary macho sex hormone, were especially low in male toads from sites near substantial farming — at about the same level seen in females.

Poor boy toads out in the country were so abnormal that if they wanted progeny, they would have to adopt...

  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:21 PM EDT
Pamela Drew

How long has fertility been a problem for us as a country? How different are we from the frogs? I did an hour long interview with an Oncology doctor with a Ph.D. in leukemia and lymphoma and he talked about the studies that had revealed the increases in lymphomas and other cancers from exposure to farm chemicals. I think we used a clip where he talked about how these are in the food supply as well and responsible for some of the increases in population wide cancers.

The volume of hormone altering substances that come from intended and unintended exposure and ingestion should make us look at these truths with a seriously concerned view. We see signs everywhere. Since everything about gender is hormonal it has made me wonder if the surge in bisexuality and same sex relationships isn't the natural byproduct of chemically altered systems.

That is not to pass any moral judgement on anyone who has an alternative lifestyle. Whatever floats your boat so long as it is between consenting adults, is their own business and makes no never mind to me. But from a purely clinical view tracking behaviors that reflect an imbalance makes you wonder if hormone laced dairy and meats, with some chemicals on the side aren't responsible.

How would the NASCAR crowd feel if they thought Monsanto milk makes you gay? Would they see then that petrochemical polluters threaten us more than anything else?

  • 3 votes
#5.1 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:03 AM EDT
MinnieApolis

How would the NASCAR crowd feel if they thought Monsanto milk makes you gay?

I had to laugh at that image. Yeah, those are the guys we gotta start talking to and talking to till they can understand that chemicals can mess up our own biochemicals -- AND even increase the number of gay/sterile men. Ya gotta make some connection between farm chemicals (which then get into our food and water) and the increase in biochemical disturbances.

    #5.2 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:27 PM EDT
    Reply
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com